16: THE DAY THE EARTH STOOD STILL

Why I chose it?


I had just finished some Christmas shopping and was at a loose end, thinking it was too early for Sunday dinner. I was keen to watch a movie but The Baader Meinhof Complex and Changeling were on at inconvenient times. So I was left with The Day The Earth Stood Still.


Where?


Shaftesbury Avenue, 6.30pm.

Comments?

I have never seen the original 1950s science fiction movie The Day The Earth Stood Still, but I had heard about it and the character, Klaatu and the image of the giant being with the laser beam eyes were instantly recognisable. The storyline wasn't, so I went into this remake without much of an idea about its plot.

The movie is quite entertaining, good special effects and an interesting premise about aliens landing on Earth to teach us humans a few lessons. It's a spin on the usual "aliens taking over the planet" and the annihilation of humans is kept to a minimum; at least initially. The appearance and purpose of the aliens' visit is revealed very early on, leaving the tension for the question of whether they can be stopped or not.


The problem with this movie, for me, is that it tries to avoid coming over all preachy and issuey but fails miserably; it could easily be categorised as another in a long line of movies whose underlying theme or moral revolves around the environment and how humans are destroying the planet. This is an important issue but the message is starting to dilute.


If it is delivered subtlety, (like in Wall∙E), it works; if it is delivered by an alien who admonishes the human race for raping the planet and orders complete destruction of all evidence of human occupation as punishment, we are in danger of treating the audience as a bunch of school kids who need a good telling off. When people laugh at dialogue meant to be thought provoking, you know the message isn't getting through. And you can't blame the audience for getting a little sick about being reminded about our impending doom if we don't stop using plastic bags or wasting water. The message is important, but it should not be delivered in this way.


And Will Smith's son is annoying.


Would I pay to see it?


No.


Rating?


5 out of 10


Post Movie Quote:


"Can we please lay off the remakes for a while? It's starting to look like there are no more original ideas left out there."

Movies I'm Excited About - #1

Bale as John Connor; set in the future; nuff said. Check out the kick ass trailer here.

And I absolutely love this poster!

15: BODY OF LIES

Why I chose it?

Despite the two big names in the lead, it was Sir Ridley Scott as director that pulled me towards this one. I've always been a big fan, love his style and American Gangster was up there as my favourite movie of 2007.

Where?

Shaftesbury Avenue, 8.45pm. (There's not enough angle on the seating, so I got a crick in the neck after watching this 2hr plus movie).

Comments?

Body Of Lies is based on a novel by David Ignatius and follows the crusade of a CIA operative on the trail of a terrorist who has recently taken credit for bombings in Continental Europe and whose secret safehouse is believed to be in Jordon. Ferris (DiCaprio) is assisted by CIA Boss Hoffman (Crowe) in tracking down the terrorist leader and bringing him to justice, but has motives, information and plans of his own which he keeps to himself, thus putting Ferris and others in danger.

I found this movie very intriguing and, as I have said, I am a big fan of Scott's direction (except when he creates an effect on screen where the images blur and jump, which he did once in this movie and too many times in Hannibal). The tension is tangible throughout, not just in the action scenes, but in the dialogue, most notably between Ferris and Hani Salaam, head of the Jordanian General Intelligence Department (superbly played by Mark Strong).

There are issues raised here about government policy, the threat of terrorism and the tragedy of war. Scenes of bombings in public places (Manchester, Amsterdam, Turkey) resonate, especially since recent events overseas. However, it is the underlying theme of secrets withheld and lies told that creates the greatest tension and which result in the direst of consequences.

There is an element of realism here that had an impact on the layman (me) and the drama unfolding on the screen is captivating. There is globetrotting around some of the most dangerous parts of the world, including Iraq, and I found much interest in some of the aerial shots of these locations. Scenes of torture and violence are graphic and realistic, not for shock value, but to add to the tension; still, most are very hard to watch.

DiCaprio and Crowe (who added plenty of weight to "fill" the role of the CIA boss) are engaging to watch, DiCaprio going from strength to strength since Blood Diamond. As I mentioned above, Mark Strong is superb as the Jordanian intelligence boss, who toes the line of righteousness with methods that are questionable but effective. Just don't lie to him. And there was a pleasant surprise to see a well-liked Australian actor amongst it all (see below).

This is an explosive movie, and not just in the pyrotechnics, and it is one of the better movies to address the war on the ground in the Middle East and the fight, as ill directed as one may think, against terrorists. It also has a much better thematic approach than last year's The Kingdom. Some critics point out that the long running time desensitises the film's impact, but I, for one, can say that my interest was held throughout.

Another worthy effort by Sir Ridley Scott.

Would I pay to see it?

Yes.

Rating?

8 out of 10

Post Movie Quote:

"I knew that was Vince Colosimo!" said with visions of buying the Underbelly TV series next year.

14: WALL∙E

Why I chose it?

You can't go past a Pixar movie, from Toy Story to Ratatouille, they produce some of the most magical stories with unbelievable images and memorable characters - brings out the kid in me!

Where?

Wandsworth, just after Batman - yes, I am that far behind in my posts.

Comments?

This movie is a delight to watch, quite touching, quite humourous and the visuals are amazing. As with all Pixar movies, it is just as entertaining for the adults as it is for the kids. In fact, the heartfelt story of this little robot who falls in love, pulls on the heartstrings and touches the emotions in a way that is beyond the comprehension of a child. The kids will love the antics of little Wall∙E and his offsider and the magic of space will enthrall them, but it is the story that will resonate with the adults.

As appears to be the norm lately, there is a statement about environmental concerns and the impact on our way of life if we don't do something about addressing sustainability, but it is handled very well, bringing in an element of humour without softening the message. Ultimately, however, this is a love story and even though we are talking about robots here, you will not be untouched by Wall∙E's feelings of loneliness, infatuation, heartache and happiness.

And he's such a cute little fella too.


Would I pay to see it?

Yes, highly entertaining stuff.

Rating?

9 out of 10

Post Movie Quote:

"Waalllllleeeeee. Eeeevaaaah," repeated ad nauseum.

13: THE DARK KNIGHT

Why I chose it?

This Batman movie has looked impressive ever since the first brief images of Heath Ledger as The Joker appeared on the internet. As more and more images and trailers appeared, more and more fans salivated and wrung their hands, waiting for the release date. This was one of those movies that would never be overhyped. How could I not watch it?

Where?

Cinema 2, Wandsworth, 6.30pm.

Comments?

The Dark Knight is superb. It’s one of those movies that come along all too infrequently – picture perfect. It’s dark, emotive, powerful, frenetic and the action never lets up – this is a superhero movie for those who hate superhero movies. And for those who LOVE superhero movies.

The plot is complex: gang bosses and deals with the devil; a brave politician who toes the line within a corrupt world but is a hero in his own right, without the fancy gear and gadgets; a business tycoon battling between his duty to a city and his love for a woman; and a crazed man in a dark suit, hanging out the window of a stolen police car, cackling at his own deviousness, improving the standard of the Gotham City criminal with a smile.

I already want to see this film again.

It was Rupert Wyatt, first time director of The Escapist, who said in an interview in Empire magazine that he admired Christopher Nolan’s ability to take on a big blockbuster movie and still convey his own personal style, or something like that. He was definitely referring to The Dark Knight – it is more subtle than Memento or The Prestige in its cinematic wizardry but the tricks of the trade that Nolan continually invents are all there – complex story structure, fast paced, quick cuts, sleight of hand – it helps that he wrote the script as well with his brother – a brilliant script at that. Some say the movie is too long – sure it’s long but given that I didn’t ever want it to finish means it wasn’t long enough.

The acting is excellant too. Heath Ledger is amazing in this movie. Almost thankfully, he is unrecognisable under all that makeup, but his acting ability still shines through – he licks his lips constantly; rolls his wrist, flicking his knife open; tells each victim a different origin story more gruesome than the last; and delivers a masterpiece performance of a complete maniac called The Joker. Sure he had big shoes to fill, but he solved that problem by bringing his own.

And now we come . . . to The Batman. There’s something very dark about Christian Bale, even as Batman he scares the shit out of me. There’s always a hit of violence in his eyes, that he’s about to do something bad. Batman in The Dark Knight is just as disturbing as Bale’s other performances in American Psycho, The Machinist and Harsh Times – because this time he is the good guy! And he is perfect as The Caped Crusader.

The supporting actors are all very solid too - Maggie Gyllenhaal, Gary Oldman, Morgan Freeman, Michael Caine as Alfred and a standout performance by Aaron Eckhart as Harvey Dent – adding to this amazing superhero movie that is a two hour character study of despair, insanity and loss – and damn, isn’t it a cracking good movie!

Would I pay to see it?

Without a doubt - hopefully before it leaves our screens.

Rating?

10 out of 10

Post Movie Quote:

"It's not often I'd say this, but I'd go see that again. " The Jingo (guest quoter).

12: KUNG FU PANDA

Why I chose it?

After the depressing Wanted, I was looking for a bit of a pick me up and Jack Black seemed to be the man to supply it.


Where?


Cinema 5, Shaftesbury Avenue, 9pm.


Comments?


Kung Fu Panda is a lot of fun and a lot of it is down to Jack Black and Dustin Hoffman, offering up different styles of comedy in the guise of Po (the Panda) and Master Shifu (the smaller red panda). There are many humourous moments, a couple of laugh out loud funnies and the animation is top notch, making this an entertaining ninety minutes to sit through.


The plot is quite standard fare but that's all it needs to be: no need for complexity in a story about a clumsy Panda dreaming of fighting alongside the Furious Five (made up of the voices of Angelina Jolie and Jackie Chan to name two of the five). Plot intricacies aside, Kung Fu Panda's strong points include attention to detail. I can't say I know much about Chinese custom or history, but the movie convinced me that the producers did, and that gave the movie some of its originality in the crowded computer animated movie stakes.



The fight scenes are also impressive, easy to follow with expressive moves and complex duels, including those that involve Po. The scene where Po takes on Master Shifu in a duel over a bowl of dumplings using chopsticks is highly engaging and entertaining.


Kung Fu Panda is a colourful, comical romp predominantly due to Jack Black, who is in top form. The kids will love it and the adults will find it good throwaway fun.


Would I pay to see it?


Tough question with this one. It isn't as impressive as Toy Story was or Wall-E is billed to be, but it's still great fun. Not necessarily one to see at the movies; more a DVD rental or Sky movie option for me.


Rating?


6 out of 10


Post Movie Quote:


"Jolie wasn't half as sexy in this one." Daryl Nilbett

11: WANTED

Why I chose it?

The trailer for Wanted looked pretty hot, in more ways than one, and I like James McEvoy's work. Guns, explosions and oh yeah, Angelina Jolie.

Where?

Cinema 5, Shaftesbury Avenue, 6.40pm (the only Cineworld close by that was showing it!)

Comments?

I am like any hot-blooded male - I like action flicks, I like carnage and I like a bit of cinematic violence. But Wanted left me with a sour taste in my mouth. Sure, there was violence and most of it was shot, pardon the pun, in a very unique way, making it quite visually pleasing (and much more so when Jolie hit the screen) and some would say it was entertaining. I wouldn't.

This movie lacked a moral grounding. People are killed left, right and centre and not one of their deaths, including any main characters you may have grown attached to, have any meaning. Even the deaths of the targets of this "fraternity of assassins" are without purpose. The assassins don't know why they are being killed; we don't know why they are being killed - they just are, in the most flamboyant ways imaginable.

When one of the main characters works out a unique way of shooting a target through the sun roof of a car, he grins and fires away and the audience is expected to grin with him, laugh even, marvel at how clever he is. Sure, if this target was the main villain of the piece who has alluded death many times before, it would be a good set piece and we would be cheering. But we don't even know what this guy has done to warrant death in the first place!

Another fatal flaw of Wanted is that it starts off quite brilliantly, approaching the subject matter very tongue in cheek. No hoper (McAvoy) is being pursued by a gun man for no reason that he can discern but is protected by a sexy gun-toting assassin (Jolie) who believes he is the next big thing in the assassin world. There are some ludicrous car chase moves which are gleefully enjoyable and there is a classic scene involving a computer keyboard and the face of a "best friend" who has been cheating on McAvoy's girlfriend. All very funny stuff.

Then the movie starts to take itself seriously, the laughs dry up, the dark humour dissipates and people start dying for no apparent reason. The assassins are taking orders from a loom in a textile mill through a binary code hidden in weaving errors of the cotton fabric - it's called (cough, ahem) The Loom of Fate. In the first twenty minutes, this scenario may have brought a few laughs; at the point in the movie when everything is taken seriously, all it got was a few groans.

Maybe I'm getting old, but this shoot 'em up had less morals than last year's Shoot 'Em Up, and left me lambasting the movie like an old man waving his wooden cane and telling youngsters to turn that music down!

If it wasn't for Angelina . . .

Would I pay to see it?

No.

Rating?

3.5 out of 10 (an extra 1/2 point for Jolie's presence - jeez, I'm shallow!)

Post Movie Quote:

"Wham, Bang, no thank you ma'am." Daryl Nilbett

Best Free Movie Of The Year - Nomination - Month #3

Oh dear.

Month 3 (June 21 - July 20) was a light one, wasn't it? During the 30 odd days since Gone Baby Gone was announced as Best Free Movie Of The Year - Nomination #2, I managed to see, wait for it, wait for it - one movie.

One. One solitary movie in a month. What in god's name was I doing that whole month? Getting a life, some might say - but in terms of reaching the goal quite clearly displayed at the top of the page, it was a pitiful display. I need to pull my finger out.

But I bet the guys at Cipher Films and Limelight would be pointing out the silver lining. Their independent film based in London and starring relative unknowns has made the BFMOTY nominations, by default. As Homer Simpson would say: "Default! The two sweetest words in the English language."

That's a bit harsh though - there is a reasonable chance that I would've picked this movie anyway, especially if I had been subjected to too many mediocre blockbusters in a row during the month. One or two mediocre blockbusters is okay, but a whole string of them leaves you feeling a little dead inside.

So without further ado and dropping the need for a build up of tension, the third nomination for Best Free Movie Of The Year is:

ADULTHOOD

Well done guys.

So the average amount of movies per month for me to see in order to reach the big 100has jumped to 10! I really do need to pull my finger out, even more so given that as I post this entry, I am already 11 days into Month 4 and haven't been to the flicks yet!

Dang this hot, summery weather!

10: ADULTHOOD

Why I chose it?

Plain and simple, I wanted to watch something from the independent stable. Too many blockbusters in a row has deadened the impact, especially when one of those blockbusters was The Happening. Time to see something raw and without the over the top special effects.

Where?

Cinema 4, Wandsworth Southside Shopping Centre, 7.10pm (experienced first hand bus rage on the way to the cinemas with a 12 year old who insisted on playing music on her mobile at the highest volume; thought I'd risk getting knifed just to get me into the mood).

Comments?

This was exactly what I was after - a movie that is raw, visceral and without any visible boom mikes.

Adulthood is a sequel, set six years after the movie Kidulthood, which was also written by director Noel Clarke. It is quite an eye-opening look at life in West London for these young adults with violence, drugs and really bad language the order of the day. I haven't seen Kidulthood but I suspect it is more of the same, but with the added impact of the main characters at a younger age.

Not seeing Kidulthood doesn't detract from enjoying this sequel, even though the events do have a major impact on the set up of Adulthood. In short, Sam Peel has just come out of the slammer after doing something really bad at the end of Kidulthood and there are a number of people out for revenge. He has a few allies along the way but they are just as flawed and messed up as he is and they cause him more grief than good.

Adulthood is pretty full on and the skill of the actors involved creates an increased level of realism. It's the perfect independent film to foil big-blockbusters-itis and has the added fun of spotting London landmarks ("Look, there's Hammersmith tube station!"). The Mexican standoff ending is a bit lame, especially after the action that precedes it but that is a minor grumble.

Adulthood is not as good as similar urban gang movies such as Bullet Boy, Tsotsi and the brilliant City of God, but it does have an impact on the viewer. I will definitely be thinking twice before joining in on road, restaurant, bus or any other type of rage on the London streets.

Would I pay to see it?

Innit.

Rating?

6.5 out of 10

Post Movie Quote:

"Don't look at anyone. Keep staring ahead. Let that guy play his music on the bus. Don't worry about the girl next to you smoking. Just keep calm." Daryl Nilbett

Best Free Movie Of The Year - Nomination - Month #2

Month two (May 21 - June 20) delivered a round of big blockbusters including the long awaited Indiana Jones movie, destined to be in the running for the Best Free Movie Of The Year.

I increased the monthly average of movies watched in May/June but not by much, and I am still languishing behind the 8-9 movies per month I need to see to hit the big 100. Two movies a week is much harder than it sounds, especially given the great sunny weather that London has been having lately. I've even had a few guilt trips while sitting in the cinema with the sun shining outside - guilt trips, but no regrets (how about The Happening, I hear you ask? Sure, I regretted seeing that movie, but luckily, it was miserable outside that day, so no double whammy).

So, what movie knocked my socks off this month? Was there a better movie than what Indy had to offer? Or was there a sleeper hit ready to knock the fedora wearing archaeologist off his perch?

Before I announce the nomination this month, I must clarify that The Incredible Hulk falls into this month's considerations. Although the post was made after the 20th of June, I did see it before that date. I was just being slack.

Anyway, without further ado, the second nomination for The Best Free Movie Of The Year is:

GONE BABY GONE

I still think about this movie almost a month after seeing it and I will be taking Kathy to see it on Monday. An outstanding directorial debut by Ben Affleck, brilliant acting by his brother Casey and the rest of the cast, and a powerful movie full of suspense and emotion. The front runner (after two months) for the big award.

Sorry Indy.

9: THE INCREDIBLE HULK

Why I chose it?

Seeking out another blockbuster after the disappointment of The Happening, The Incredible Hulk looked entertaining and visually impressive. Having not seen the first Ang Lee movie which received a critically and commercially luke warm response, I had no expectations of a return to form for the big green monster. I hoped that this would increase my enjoyment.

Where?

Cinema 2, Wandsworth Southside Shopping Centre, 7.10pm (I now have this uncanny knack of getting there by bus with moments to spare.)

Comments?

Firstly, I was surprised it wasn’t an origin movie. My perception going in was that this movie was to wipe the slate clean of the first one, starting from scratch. Except for a recap of sorts over the opening credits, this second instalment of The Incredible Hulk is a continuation and begins with Bruce Banner hiding out from the American military, trying to find a cure for his furious temper that, if unchecked, gives way to a bad case of CGI-tis.

After the initial scene setting, the movie just passed me by. Not necessarily a case of “so what” but as events unraveled on the screen, action sequences and character scenes alike, they had little impact. It was also hard to sympathise with the title character. The Incredible Hulk was masterly presented in computer generated beauty, but this made it difficult for me when I was searching for the tormented human Bruce Banner within, even when his eyes went all gooey at the sight of Liv Tyler. At least with Lou Ferrigno (who has a short cameo here), he kinda looked human.

The movie isn’t as bad as all that. It stacks up pretty well against Iron Man, another recent superhero movie, and has a better battle finale, but Ed Norton is no Robert Downey Jnr when it comes to portraying intriguing alter egos. The Incredible Hulk does have some positives: it has some good action sequences and doesn’t fall into superhero clichés (except for the aforementioned final fight).

My assessment of this movie may have been dragged down by the fact that I have become tired of multi-million dollar blockbusters after the long spate of them since [REC]. The Incredible Hulk is a reasonable superhero outing, but compared to Iron Man, which it has more in common with than first thought, it can not be said to be memorable.

Would I pay to see it?

It's borderline but I would say yes.

Rating?

5.5 out of 10

Post Movie Quote:

"Time for some independent movies; I’m all blockbusted out." Daryl Nilbett

8: THE HAPPENING

Why I chose it?

M. Night Shyamalan's form of late has been mysteriously mediocre since Signs (and even that was borderline disappointing) but the excellent Sixth Sense still gives the movie goer some hope that one day M. Night's great storytelling abilities will return to form. Previews of The Happening suggest that the day may have arrived.

Where?

Cinema 2, Hammersmith, 6.30pm (Got there a little late and missed The X-Files preview!)

Comments?

What has gone wrong with M. Night Shyamalan? He used to be such an adept screenwriter and a director of atmospheric, tense and intriguing tales. Unique and entertaining. Now his movies have the quality of direct-to-video rubbish (and without any sex or dodgy gross out scenes to keep us amused).

His form has dropped off considerably and it's hard to reconcile The Sixth Sense to his latest outing. It's like watching your favourite AFL footy team go from a winning streak at the start of the season to getting walloped by 100 points by Round 11 (or in soccer parlance: 6 nil by mid-December) with exactly the same team on the field. It's very hard to understand why the quality has dropped. Complacency perhaps? Lack of pressure? Surely M. Night can no longer live off the cred he received after his brilliant debut, but that said, that was the main reason why I went to see The Happening in the first place.

Why is it so bad? Poor acting (Walhberg looks out of place, Zooey Deschanel is horrid), dialogue as corny and unrealistic as anything George Lucas has conjured up, and a story that lacks direction, tension and a satisfying ending. I won't go into it too much here so as not to give away the plot (a policy on this blog), but let it be said that surely M. Night could've come up with a more thoughtful and clever way of making a political statement (if that's what he's trying to do here - not entirely sure).

This would have been an average Twilight Zone episode on a good day.

And can I just add: I can't believe how sloppy a director can be to allow a shot to make it through to the final cut where the boom mike makes an appearance. M. Night committed this cardinal sin (in my book, anyway) four times. Count them - FOUR times. And we're not just talking about "blink-and-you-miss-it" type appearances - one of the mikes, with a nice bright red casing, hovers around the actors for at least two minutes! At one stage, I thought these errors were intentional and that M.Night's customary twist in the tale ending would reveal a Truman Show style caper. Unfortunately, I wasn't that fortunate.

Would I pay to see it?

A resounding no.

Rating?

2 out of 10 (a point lost for the cameo boom mike (who was on the screen so much, it should've got an acting credit))

Post Movie Quote:

"That's the first time I've tut-tuted at the end of a movie. Good night M. Night." Daryl Nilbett

7: INDIANA JONES AND THE KINGDOM OF THE CRYSTAL SKULL

Why I chose it?


If this was my first time seeing Indy 4, I would've ignored this question - it's Indy, of course I'm going to see it!


Why see it again? I wanted to enjoy it all over again but I also wanted to see if the mixed feelings I had about the ending could be rectified with an expectation free repeat viewing.


Where?


Cinema 13, Wandsworth Southside Shopping Centre, 7.15pm (Wandsworth again? I hear you say. Well, it's got the most screens and the popcorn is rocking and I quite enjoy the bus ride.)


Comments?


This is definitely an Indy movie - wise cracks, close calls, car chases, nasty villains, the fedora - it's all here and a whole lot of fun it is too. Indy is back!


Harrison Ford, albeit 20 years older since the last instalment, still pulls it off as the archaeologist adventurer out to discover all the wonders of the world and keep them out of the hands of those nasty Nazis (or in this case, Russians).






It's very entertaining and you can tell the whole production gang enjoyed themselves too. The addition of Shia LaBeouf is great, a James Dean type who takes a fair share of the action, leaving the much older Jonesy to stunts that are more considerate of his age. However, that said, Harrison Ford doesn't shy away from the action, performing the majority of his own stunts with impressive strength and agility. If the light is right and you can't see the silver hair, he doesn't look a day older than The Last Crusade.


As mentioned above, I've already seen this movie and had mixed feelings about the plot device and the ending. We had The Ark of the Covenant, the Sankara stone and the Holy Grail - all plot devices with religious and spiritual connotations. Kingdom of The Crystal Skull offers up something a little bit left of field and maybe a little too far out there to fit into the mold of the Indy movies we love so dearly. Sure, the plot is relevant to the period in question and should resonate with modern audiences, but something about it doesn't click and unfortunately, I'm still on the fence about it after a second viewing. In fact, I hasten to say that I enjoyed it a little less the second time around.


That said, what the movie does do is bring back the memories of the Indy franchise, back when my dad took me to see my first movie, Raiders of the Lost Ark, and how it scared the crap out of me. Great memories, rekindled by a movie that stays true to the originals but is brave enough to try something different, even if that decision's success is still not decided in my mind.


Still great fun!


Would I pay to see it?


Already did.


Rating?


7.5 out of 10 (an extra half point for nostalgic reasons)


Post Movie Quote:


"Can't wait to watch the old ones again!" Daryl Nilbett, with a crack of his whip.

6: GONE BABY GONE

Why I chose it?

This movie was delayed for nine months in the UK to respect the feelings of the parents and those close to Madeleine McCann. However, the film's parallels to that tragic real life abduction case was not why I wanted to see it - I actually saw a poster for Gone Baby Gone in Chicago last September and it looked good. I had just seen Casey Affleck in the Jesse James movie and was liking his work. It is also Ben Affleck's directorial debut, which makes for interesting viewing, and by all reports, he has received the thumbs up. To top it off, it's based on a book by Dennis Lehane, an author I have not read but I have heard a lot about - in particular for his work on The Wire and for another one of his books, Mystic River, which has also been adapted, with Oscar winning results.

Where?

Cinema 12, Wandsworth Southside Shopping Centre, 6.10pm (I know, I know, I should've been outside in the sun.)

Comments?

This is a must see - a very moving, emotional and gripping movie, perfectly handled by Ben Affleck for his first go at directing.

I must admit, the first few scenes had me thinking about Madeleine McCann, but soon after, it was the story of the little girl Amanda and the private investigator asked to find her that had me engrossed.


Casey Affleck is excellent as Patrick Kenzie, his subtle expressions and quiet voice perfect for the role as the honest, street wise P.I. who attempts to find the missing four year old girl. Other standouts in the cast include Ed Harris, Michelle Monaghan and in particular, Amy Ryan as the mother whose sordid life attracts blame for the disappearance of her only child.

The questions faced by the principal characters are not clear cut, making each decision all the more gut wrenching and impacting.

Parents watching this movie will find it hard to keep their emotions under control; everyone else will be both distressed and moved by this story of a little lost girl.

Would I pay to see it?

Yes.

Rating?

9 out of 10 (even though it is a completely different genre and they have the same rating, I would put this above The Orphanage and [REC]).

Post Movie Quote:

"Gone Baby Gone is an important film delivered with honesty and ability by everyone involved, especially the Affleck brothers. Inspiring to me not just as a film buff, but also as a writer." Daryl Nilbett, pensive.

5: IN BRUGES

Why I chose it?

I'm always up for crime movies with a bit of dark comedy, and based on the previews, this seemed to fit into that category quite well. I also saw an interview with the director (who has a background in theatre) and it sounded interesting.

Where?

Cinema 12, Wandsworth Southside Shopping Centre, 8.25pm (took the 28 bus from Paddington

Comments?

I really enjoyed this one. Colin Farrell, Brendan Gleeson and Ralph Fiennes were superb, delivering a witty and entertaining script perfectly.

There's dark humour for sure, and more than its fair share of violence, but there are underlying mature themes that are delivered with subtlety and skill. One particular scene had me close to tears, not of laughter, but sadness - an event that drives one of the characters to great despair.

But there's comedy to be had here too. There are laugh out loud classic lines even if the jokes are non PC and there are enough C bombs to warrant the 18 rating. On the face of it, these elements interlaced with drawn out Bruges snapshots and a simple melodic soundtrack don't seem to gel, but take my word for it, it all fits perfectly.

Slow at times, cliche ridden at others, but entertaining and thought provoking.

Dark with a heart.

Would I pay to see it?

For sure - this movie has more substance than anything Guy Ritchie has produced and it has better laughs.

Rating?

7 out of 10

Post Movie Quote:

"Very good - really enjoyed it. Now how the f$*k do I get home from here?!" Daryl Nilbett, while searching for the nearest bus stop.

Paying For It - Number 1

Sometimes, you just have to pay for it.

Although I have an unlimited Cineworld card that allows me free movies for a year, there are moments, sometimes within in my control, sometimes out of my control, where I will have to fork over the £10 plus to catch the latest flick.

As I have a target of reaching 100 free movies in one year (and because I love getting things for free), I won't be handing over my hard earned cash that often. But sometimes a movie warrants a big event type screening at an eff off sized theatre complex with 1/2 mile screens and a defeaning sound system - i.e. IMAX cinemas - or it justifies paying a little over the odds to enjoy a comfortable screening in a cinema where hardly any punter turns up - i.e. Apollo cinema.

And of course, sometimes, I just can't get to a Cineworld cinema. But that is rare, as they are all over the place.

Last weekend, Kathy and I were in Edinburgh for the marathon (well done, Kath on the PB!). Post marathon relaxation (yes, I was exhausted from all the supporting and cheering) included a flick at the local Vue cinema. There is a Cineworld in Edinburgh but it is in Haymarket and is a little out of the way if you are staying in Leith - so, I pulled out the wallet and paid over the cash.

But, I didn't mind - because I went to see (with big booming voice):

INDIANA JONES AND THE KINGDOM OF THE CRYSTAL SKULL

Let's just say it was money well spent. I will save my review for when I watch it again (for free) but I can safely say that it was a very entertaining movie with Indy back and at his best, despite the ludicrous ending.

I'm giving it a few weeks before watching it again, but watch out for it in the 100 sooner rather than later.

Best Free Movie Of The Year - Nomination - Month #1

In the fourth week of April 2009, I will be picking my favourite movie from the 100 seen during my year of free cinema. I expect that there will be numerous contenders for the crown, so in order to make it easier on myself (and make up the numbers re: blog entries), I will select the best movie I've seen each month and thus nominating them for the coveted award of BEST FREE MOVIE OF THE YEAR.

During Month 1 (constituting April 21 to May 20), I saw four movies, well below the average of 8 1/3 movies a month required to hit the big 100. A slow month for sure, but there wasn't a dud amongst them - quality, not quantity, is what I'm talking about.

All four movies had me leaving the cinema thinking - they made an impression. Some more than others and all in their own special way.

However, without further ado, I announce the first nomination for Best Free Movie Of The Year:

THE ORPHANAGE

This was the first movie I saw with my Cineworld free movie card, so it has some nostalgic significance, but it is also the pick of the bunch - a frightening but ultimately moving horror story delivered perfectly and with heart - a true contender for the BFMOTY.

On to Month 2!

4 : SPEED RACER

Why I chose it?

The Wachowski brothers - those dudes who came up with The Matrix Trilogy - said to have pushed the boundaries on visual effects once again!

Where?

Cinema 2, Hammersmith, 8.20pm (right after Iron Man with only enough time for a 6" Sub)

Comments?

All I can say is WOW. Yeah, it's pretty much a kid's flick, a little cheesy and some of the race scenes are confusing, but with the AMAZING CGI effects and a great cast, this is definitely a must see. It's bold in its visuals, writing and direction and its nothing like anything you've ever seen before.

You'll either hate it or love it but you will definitely be impressed by it! Take the kids if you've got 'em!

Would I pay to see it?

My word yes, this movie stayed with me a long time afterwards (and not just because of the catchy theme song). If I get a chance, I'll be doing a repeat viewing. Might even go and see it at IMAX in 3D.

Rating?

8 out of 10

Post Movie Quote:

"Go Speed Racer, Go Speed Racer, Go Speed Racer, GO!!" Repeating over and over in Daryl Nilbett's head.

3 : IRON MAN

Why I chose it?

Robert Downey Jnr really. Yes, I was pretty keen to see a good superhero movie and the trailer looked exciting, but it was Mr Downey Jnr's turn as Tony Stark which drew me in - it was supposed to be quite a unique character as superhero's ulter egos go.

Where?

Cinema 4, Hammersmith, 5.30pm (had to run to make it!)

Comments?

The effects were very good and the build up to how Stark becomes Iron Man was interesting, but it was Robert Downey Jnr who made this movie watchable - very entertaining. As for the plot, the backstory dominated the movie leaving little room for any big time battles except for the finale, which was okay at today's superhero movie standards. Jeff Bridges was excellent as Obadiah Stane - a far cry from The Dude but entertaining nonetheless.

Would I pay to see it?

I think I would: it was enjoyable and Downey Jnr was quite funny.

Rating?

6.5 out of 10

Post Movie Quote:

"Very entertaining, but what's next? Ah, yes - Speed Racer!" Daryl Nilbett.

2 : [REC]

Why I chose it?

Comparisons to Blair Witch - which would normally flag it up as a piece of shite - but this isn't an American film, it's Spanish, so I braced for something different, and based on the other Spanish movie I saw, something downright scary.

Where?

Cinema 6, Trocadero, 9.15pm



Comments?

Reading subtitles while the camera moves and shakes is a challenge but the subject matter and intensity on the screen makes you forget all about it. I think I jumped out of my seat about five times. This is one scary follando film (pardon my Spanish).


Would I pay to see it?

Yes I would and I would fork out some money for brown underpants next time too.

Rating?

9 out of 10

Post Movie Quote:

"Gee, the Spanish know how to scare the shit out of you! "Daryl Nilbett (to anyone who would listen).

1 : EL ORFANATO (THE ORPHANAGE)

Why I chose it?

Involvement of Guillermo Del Toro (Pan's Labyrinth, Hellboy); a bit of a buzz surrounding it from critics and viewers alike (which isn't always a good thing).

Where?

Cinema 2, Haymarket

Comments?

Quite an enthralling psychological thriller with superbly handled supernatural elements; great use of sound; plenty of "edge of your seat, hold your breath" sequences.

Would I pay to see it?

Yes! Full price!!

Rating?

9 out of 10

Post Movie Quote:

"Scary and frightening, but ultimately, heartbreaking. A great start to the 100!!" Daryl Nilbett (to no one in particular).

Lights! Camera! Action!

And so it begins.

One hundred movies in a year. Roughly two a week. All starting from yesterday, 20 April 2008.

And it's all free.

How is that? I hear you ask. Well, The Jingo bought me a Cineworld Unlimited movie pass for one whole year for my birthday last year. Great pressie; great chick.

Free movies at any of the Cineworld theatres - Trocadero, Haymarket, Chelsea, Fulham Road, even Dublin - for one whole year!

I activated the card yesterday at Haymarket cinema with giddy glee. They took a photo of me for identification purposes and based on the photo, I will need to be shitfaced on beer and raspberry snaps for me to pass inspection. No, I wasn't drunk yesterday; it's just a rotten picture.

I activated the card, bought some popcorn and soft drink and headed into Cinema 2, where I saw Movie Number One, which was anything but rotten.

Roll it!