Wednesday, 11 February 2009

20: MILK (OSCAR SERIES)

Eye on which Oscar?

Performance by an actor in a leading role - Sean Penn

Performance by an actor in a supporting role - Josh Brolin

Achievement in directing - Gus Van Sant

Best motion picture of the year

Where?

West India Quay, 5.30pm (first time at this cinema, very nice and modern, tiered seating, big screens, big sound, on the DLR).

Comments?

Milk is a tender, faithful and ultimately heartbreaking true story about Harvey Milk, an American politician and gay rights activist who was the first openly gay man to be elected into politics as a member of the San Francisco Board of Supervisors. It was a major win for the gay movement and many celebrated the nomination in the Castro District of San Francisco, where Milk established his base.

Milk's life as we join it in the movie, is unfulfilled and dissatisfying, a dead end job and a suppressed personal life. He begins a relationship with Scott Smith and together they head for San Francisco for a better, more open life. They witness oppression and bigotry towards homosexuals, forming the catalyst for Milk's move into politics. His mandate: equal rights for gays. He is unsuccessful during two campaigns, but with Smith and a team of dedicated workers who believe in his cause, he achieves his historical election to the Board of Supervisors.

The movie is upheld by the spirit of Harvey Milk, a heart-warming man who stood up for what he and many others believed in. He became an icon for the gay movement, a spokesperson, and unfortunately, a target. However, his ultimate downfall is not brought on solely by homophobic sources, but from a disturbed fellow Supervisor, Dan White, who lets the pressure of the situation and his own confused state lead him to an unspeakable act.

The acting performances are amazing in this movie, with Sean Penn leading the charge as Harvey Milk. Other notable turns are from James Franco as Scott Smith, Josh Brolin as Dan White and Emile Hirsch as Cleve Jones. Deigo Luna contributes a fine supporting role as Jack Lira, a lost soul who falls for the charismatic Milk but struggles to share him with the man's political passion.

Milk is an entertaining movie that will pull at the heart strings. It depicts an important episode in the gay movement with honesty and heart, a true reflection of the man, Harvey Milk.

Oscar worthy?

Milk has four nominations in the major categories of this year's Oscars, with no other film faring better. It definitely deserves the nominations, an excellent, moving film with fine performances.

Josh Brolin's portrayal of Supervisor Dan White is expertly done. However, he has reasonably little screen time for a supporting role. What he does with it is tremendously good and he is a fine actor, but he is up against Heath Ledger and the two performances are miles apart.

As for the Directing and Best Movie nominations, I'd say it is right up there with the other four in each category. A thoroughly entertaining movie depicting an important movement in political history. Gus Van Sant's direction is flawless, an exceptional effort indeed. It's hard to tell thus far who will win, who is a dark horse and who will miss out on the golden statue in these categories. We may see a split in the categories, where normally, Best Directing follows Best Movie. If I had to make a call, I would say Milk stands a better chance in Best Movie.

As for Sean Penn, his performance mesmerised me; it was outstanding. The character is so believable, it actually feels like you are watching the man's life unfold before you. Big smiles, subtle campness and fine acting add to the transformation. But it is more than just a transformation, it is an expression of Milk's tenacity and big heart, his ruthlessness and caring persona, a statement of what it meant to be gay in San Francisco in the seventies. I haven't seen The Wrestler yet, but my hot tip is that Sean Penn will win the Oscar.

Rating?

8.5 out of 10

Post Movie Quote:

It's bloody cold," in reference to standing outside waiting for the DLR to arrive.

Monday, 2 February 2009

19: FROST / NIXON (OSCAR SERIES)

Eye on which Oscar?

Performance by an actor in a leading role - Frank Langella

Achievement in directing - Ron Howard

Best motion picture of the year

Where?

Shaftesbury Avenue, 845pm (straight after The Reader, although I did pause, not wanting to dissipate the thoughts and feelings generated from watching that movie. A hunger for popcorn, missed due to a late arrival time at The Reader, made the decision for me).

Comments?

Frost/Nixon is about the disintegration of power and the decline of a political figure. It is also about show business and what makes good show business, what makes or breaks a career in entertainment and what the masses enjoy the most during prime time. It's about the numbers and it's about the lies.

Richard Nixon and Watergate. David Frost and a career on the brink. History brought them together in a head to head battle recorded on tape and shown to a worldwide audience. And to the winner goes the spoils.

Nothing excites me more than to watch a moment in history play out- it sends shivers up your spine and you know as you witness it that this moment is another chapter in world history. The next best thing to being there is to experience a dramatic representation of the event, to live it as it was lived, to understand what it felt like to be in the crowd in Dallas when the shots rang out, to feel the pressure of the last moments during the Cuban Missile Crisis, to wonder what the hell Harold Holt was doing jumping into the sea (okay, maybe not). It excites you, it scares you and it makes you wonder about the "what ifs". JFK, Thirteen Days, United 93, Saving Private Ryan, even a movie like Zodiac - all these depictions of real events are amazing to watch and interesting to debate.

Oliver Stone did it best in JFK. Sure the details were questionable, but there was such a sense of being there in that movie, of reliving the events of the assassination as if it was happening for the first time - and you are there, watching it happen. It drew me in for three hours and hasn't left me since.
This was what I was hoping for in Frost / Nixon. Unfortunately, it failed me. Don't get me wrong, it is a very good movie and the performances of Frank Langella and Michael Sheen are flawless. I just think Ron Howard let the side down and could taken more risks with his direction, brought the audience, made the movie more visceral and less intellectual.

There is a moment in the movie when the camera focuses on Frost (Sheen) asking a probing question directly into the camera. The image whirs across, the camera swivelling around to face Nixon (Langella) to receive his reply, right up close, face to face. At that moment, however brief it was, I felt drawn in as if on a roller coaster ride - I got excited. The camera whirred again, but not back to Frost but to the team waiting in the Green Room, egging him on. I visibly sunk into my seat, disappointed. This great use of the camera never reappeared and for the remainder of the movie I may as well have been watching the original interview. Albeit it trivial and minor, that camera pan was a glimpse at what might have been.

Frost / Nixon is a good movie, no doubt about that, and hats go off to the lead actors, who perfected their roles, giving us a sense of pity and sorrow for Nixon and a feeling of buoyancy for Frost. It just ain't no JFK.

Oscar worthy?

There is no doubting that Frank Langella's performance as Richard Nixon is a masterful one and very entertaining to watch but I don't think it deserves Oscar glory. During the movie, it felt like you were just watching someone act like Nixon as opposed to watching Nixon himself, a weakness inherent in the role and one that doesn't take anything away from Langella's acting ability. It is a shame that Michael Sheen wasn't nominated for Best Supporting Actor but that race has already been won too in my opinion. As for the movie itself, it shouldn't poll well for directing or best picture, although it may do well in Best Screenplay (Adapted).

Rating?

7 out of 10

Post Movie Quote:

"Must jump on to You Tube to see the real thing."

Sunday, 1 February 2009

18: THE READER (OSCAR SERIES)

Eye on which Oscar?

Performance by an actress in a leading role - Kate Winslet

Achievement in directing - Stephen Daldry

Best motion picture of the year

Where?

Shaftesbury Avenue, 6pm (one of two planned movies for the night).

Comments?

I was readying myself for an uncomfortable movie experience when I settled into my Cineworld seat at Shaftesbury Avenue cinema. I had seen the previews of The Reader and knew this was a movie touching on the annihilation of Jews during World War II. But that was not the half of it.

The Reader is a love story. It is still an uncomfortable viewing, but for a different reason - this is a story of first feelings: love, loss and betrayal. One can relate to the primal feelings expressed by the main characters, if not the context. What makes this movie stand out from your everyday love story is not this context, but the decisions made by the characters, each and every one in defiance of the formula. But each decision rings true, as frustrating as it is to watch.

Decisions have to be made by the audience too - a decision of sympathy and sadness for lost possibilities versus condemnation of an atrocious crime driven by nothing more than a sense of duty. It's a tough one, but the romantic in me fell for the former.

Kate Winslet is amazing as Hannah Schmitz, the object of passion for a seventeen year old Michael Berg (played with perfect innocence by David Kross) who happens across her one day when he falls sick on a tram in his home city of Berlin. All the actors, including Ralph Fiennes, are perfect, but it is Winslet's performance that resonates and rings true, that captivates and elicits conflicting feelings. Right from the start, her mannerisms, characteristics and facial expressions betray a troubled spirit, a woman dealing with her own personal shame, a shame that is misplaced when viewed objectively in the context of her other actions, and ultimately leads to her downfall. Kate Winslet's professionalism means that her performance complements the movie, without upstaging it.

The Reader is a movie that will cling to you long after it finishes, leaving you with mixed emotions and a sense of loss, but one thing is for sure, this is another great performance by a true talent.

Oscar worthy?

Not until I sat down to write this post did I realise that The Reader is up for both Best Director and Best Movie. In fact, after watching the movie, not knowing any different, I thought that it should be. This early on, it's hard to say whether it will fare well in those categories, but without evidence to the contrary, Kate Winslet will win Best Actress - her performance is pitch perfect, subtle where it has to be and just amazing to watch. The Streepster might pip her at the post, but Kate deserves it based on this performance.

Rating?

8.5 out of 10

Post Movie Quote:

"The Oscar Series has begun and Kate looks the goods."

Sunday, 25 January 2009

Oscar Nominations 2009

It's that time again and whatever you have to say about the Oscars, it's always exciting to see who has been nominated and to debate over who might win.

I'll be using my trusty Cineworld voucher to see all nominations in the six main categories and make my predictions before the Oscars take place in February.

Firstly, here are the nominations in those six categories and my initial comments:

I haven't seen any of these movies but can say straight off the bat, based on predictions and rumours buzzing around, this looks like a close call. Couldn't pick it at this early stage, although a lot of people have been talking about Mickey Rourke in The Wrestler.



The obvious noteworthy nomination is for Heath Ledger in The Dark Knight and I think he will win it, solely based on his performance, but the real surprise here is the inclusion of Robert Downey Jr in Tropic Thunder, the only other movie I have seen out of this lot. Tropic Thunder was a piss take movie with Ben Stiller, but its great to see pure comedy roles getting a mention, because Robert Downey Jnr's depiction of a method actor going to extreme measures to play the role of an African American soldier was an amazing performance. Robert Downey Jnr is a fine actor, as was Heath Ledger.



Haven't see any of these so it's hard to pick at this stage. Might have to pay to see Changeling as it is no longer screening at Cineworld. Kate Winslet got a Golden Globe for her performance in The Reader and Meryl Streep's movie, Doubt, looks the goods.



Again, I haven't seen any of these performances and haven't got much to comment on except the inclusion of Marisa Tomei, who has come out of nowhere to pick up an Oscar nom.



Ooh another tough one and another five I haven't seen. Word has it Slumdog Millionaire is the favourite, but I love David Fincher's work and would be very happy if he picked it up for his most intriguing movie yet.



Same five as directing, and same comments.


Other nominations of note: Wall E should be a shoe in for Best Animated Picture and could take the Best Original Screenplay too, The Baader Meinhof Complex (review still pending) for Best Foreign Language Film and only Milk was dropped from the big five movies for Best Adapted Screenplay, replaced by Doubt. Also, there is a very notable absence in the form of Che - haven't seen the movie but good things have been spoken about Benico Del Toro's performance and it's stunning to see that the isn't listed in any category.

So, not long to go, Oscars are on February 22, so I better get cracking. Excited about seeing most of those nominations above.

Tuesday, 20 January 2009

17: STAR WARS: THE CLONE WARS

Why I chose it?

You're either Star Trek or you're Star Wars. I've always been Star Wars and I couldn't pass up an opportunity to see another entry into the legend on the big screen. Almost missed out too - last session at Cineworld!

Where?

A long time ago, in a galaxy far, far away. I'm that far behind in my posts.

Comments?

It was the last ever session at Cineworld for the first computer animated movie entry into the Lucas legend that is Star Wars. It was out in the cinemas for a long time but I hadn't got around to seeing it. The last ever session, screening at 11am on a Sunday morning in Wandsworth - I was expecting a vacant cinema. In fact, I was the only adult there; the only adult without a kid. Yes, it was me, 100 parents and 150 kids. Mayhem.

That said, this movie was perfect for them - amazing graphics, albeit bordering on too cartoony, and loads of action. And Yoda. The little tackers lapped it up - reminded me of the first time I saw a Star Wars movie many dual moons ago.

For me the movie was entertaining, although it almost didn't feel like a Star Wars movie. I hadn't seen the TV series so hadn't been warmed up to the new visuals and the notable absence of the Twentieth Century Fox fanfare did throw me a bit. But the story is pure Star Wars and the action never lets up. I'll concede the storyline was a little weak (Jabba The Hutt's son is kidnapped?? Sounds like a plot better suited to the "Droids" cartoon) but it was good enough to keep me interested.

All the familiar characters are here too - Obi Wan, Anakin, Yoda - and a few new faces too, but most of the voices are different, except for Samuel L Jackson (who must be a true fan), Anthony Daniels and Christopher Lee. The old characters stay true to their live action counterparts and the new bods fit well into the Star Wars universe.
Overall, an entertaining Sunday morning spent with a bunch of kids experiencing a new Star Wars movie - brought back the memories! And I must say, it did fuel my excitement for the new cartoon series.

Would I pay to see it?

It's Star Wars: unless the words "Ewok Adventure" are included in the title, I'd pay to see it without question.

Rating?

7 out of 10

Post Movie Quote:
"May The Force Be With You" to every parent with a screaming child.

Tuesday, 16 December 2008

16: THE DAY THE EARTH STOOD STILL

Why I chose it?


I had just finished some Christmas shopping and was at a loose end, thinking it was too early for Sunday dinner. I was keen to watch a movie but The Baader Meinhof Complex and Changeling were on at inconvenient times. So I was left with The Day The Earth Stood Still.


Where?


Shaftesbury Avenue, 6.30pm.

Comments?

I have never seen the original 1950s science fiction movie The Day The Earth Stood Still, but I had heard about it and the character, Klaatu and the image of the giant being with the laser beam eyes were instantly recognisable. The storyline wasn't, so I went into this remake without much of an idea about its plot.

The movie is quite entertaining, good special effects and an interesting premise about aliens landing on Earth to teach us humans a few lessons. It's a spin on the usual "aliens taking over the planet" and the annihilation of humans is kept to a minimum; at least initially. The appearance and purpose of the aliens' visit is revealed very early on, leaving the tension for the question of whether they can be stopped or not.


The problem with this movie, for me, is that it tries to avoid coming over all preachy and issuey but fails miserably; it could easily be categorised as another in a long line of movies whose underlying theme or moral revolves around the environment and how humans are destroying the planet. This is an important issue but the message is starting to dilute.


If it is delivered subtlety, (like in Wall∙E), it works; if it is delivered by an alien who admonishes the human race for raping the planet and orders complete destruction of all evidence of human occupation as punishment, we are in danger of treating the audience as a bunch of school kids who need a good telling off. When people laugh at dialogue meant to be thought provoking, you know the message isn't getting through. And you can't blame the audience for getting a little sick about being reminded about our impending doom if we don't stop using plastic bags or wasting water. The message is important, but it should not be delivered in this way.


And Will Smith's son is annoying.


Would I pay to see it?


No.


Rating?


5 out of 10


Post Movie Quote:


"Can we please lay off the remakes for a while? It's starting to look like there are no more original ideas left out there."

Saturday, 13 December 2008

Movies I'm Excited About - #1


Bale as John Connor; set in the future; nuff said. Check out the kick ass trailer here.

And I absolutely love this poster!